Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078780›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Distributed and networked analysis of volumetric image data for remote collaboration of microscopy image analysis.

Alain Chen, Shuo Han, Soonam Lee, Chichen Fu, Changye Yang, Liming Wu, Seth Winfree, Kenneth W Dunn, Paul Salama, Edward J Delp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alain ChenPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-0815
Shuo HanPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Soonam LeePurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-1217
Chichen FuPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Changye YangPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Liming WuPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
Seth WinfreeNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana, United States.
Kenneth W DunnIndiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Paul SalamaPurdue University at Indianapolis, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-3879
Edward J DelpPurdue University, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Video and Image Processing Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-7323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The advancement of high-content optical microscopy has enabled the acquisition of very large three-dimensional (3D) image datasets. The analysis of these image volumes requires more computational resources than a biologist may have access to in typical desktop or laptop computers. This is especially true if machine learning tools are being used for image analysis. With the increased amount of data analysis and computational complexity, there is a need for a more accessible, easy-to-use, and efficient network-based 3D image processing system. The distributed and networked analysis of volumetric image data (DINAVID) system was developed to enable remote analysis of 3D microscopy images for biologists. Approach: We present an overview of the DINAVID system and compare it to other tools currently available for microscopy image analysis. DINAVID is designed using open-source tools and has two main sub-systems, a computational system for 3D microscopy image processing and analysis and a 3D visualization system. Results: DINAVID is a network-based system with a simple web interface that allows biologists to upload 3D volumes for analysis and visualization. DINAVID enables the image access model of a center hosting image volumes and remote users analyzing those volumes, without the need for remote users to manage any computational resources. Conclusions: The DINAVID system, designed and developed using open-source tools, enables biologists to analyze and visualize 3D microscopy volumes remotely without the need to manage computational resources. DINAVID also provides several image analysis tools, including pre-processing and several segmentation models.

Indexed as

image analysismachine learningmicroscopysoftwarevisualization

Identifiers

PMID40078780
PMCPMC11895998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.