Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078777›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

Belonging: a meta-theme analysis of women's community-making in group antenatal and postnatal care.

Anna Horn, Marsha Orgill, Deborah L Billings, Wiedaad Slemming, Astrid Van Damme, Mathilde Crone, Malibongwe Gwele, Nathalie Leister, Ashna D Hindori-Mohangoo, Katrien Beeckman and 6 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anna HornCentre for Maternal and Child Health, City St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Marsha OrgillChildren's Institute, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Deborah L BillingsGroup Care Global, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Wiedaad SlemmingChildren's Institute, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Astrid Van DammeVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mathilde CroneDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Malibongwe GweleUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nathalie LeisterUniversity of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ashna D Hindori-MohangooFoundation for Perinatal Interventions and Research in Suriname (Perisur), Paramaribo, Suriname.
Katrien BeeckmanVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Susan BradleyCentre for Maternal and Child Health, City St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Manodj P HindoriFoundation for Perinatal Interventions and Research in Suriname (Perisur), Paramaribo, Suriname.
Jedidia AbangaPresbyterian Church of Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Julia RyanUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Hana BucincaAction for Mothers and Children, Prishtina, Kosovo, Albania.
Christine McCourtCentre for Maternal and Child Health, City St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care systems are social institutions simulating microcosms of wider societies where unequal distribution of power and resources translate into inequities in health outcomes, experiences and access to services. Growing research on participatory women's groups positively highlights the influence of group-based care on health and wellbeing for women, their infants, families and wider communities across different countries. With similarities in ethos and philosophies, group care combines relational, group-based facilitation and clinical care, uniquely offering an opportunity to examine the intersections of health and social care. With collated data from Group Care for the First 1000 Days (GC_1000), we conducted a qualitative meta-thematic analysis of women's experiences of group antenatal and postnatal care in Belgium, Ghana, Kosovo, The Netherlands, South Africa, Suriname and The United Kingdom to better understand how and to what extent community-making engenders a sense of belonging amongst group care participants and how these experiences may address social well-being and health. Results from this analysis expose that women actively participate in community building in group care in three key ways: (1) Collective agreements, (2) Boundary setting and (3) Care Gestures, orchestrated via socio-spatial building embedded in key pillars of the model. This analysis also illustrates how a sense of belonging derived from group care can mobilise women to support and care for the wider community through communal building of health literacy which builds from individual to communal empowerment: (1) Individual Health, (2) Community Health, (3) Partner Involvement, (4) Social Care and (5) Including Wider Community in Group Care. This research study builds upon existing evidence from both group care and participatory women's group literature, showcasing the potential of group-based care to holistically address women's needs. This research further illustrates the ways women create a sense of belonging in the context of group care and highlights why belonging may be an integral component of the model's facilitation of improved health and well-being for individuals as well as their wider communities. More research is needed to understand the link between belonging and community mobilisation in the context of group care and how it may address the needs of underserved communities.

Indexed as

Postnatal CarePrenatal CareAdultFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansPregnancyQualitative Researchbelonginggroup carehealth inequitiesmaternity caremeta-theme analysis

Identifiers

PMID40078777
PMCPMC11897044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.