Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Evaporative coolers and wildfire smoke exposure: a climate justice issue in hot, dry regions.

Gina M Solomon, Nayamin Martinez, Julie Von Behren, Isabella Kaser, David Chang, Aditya Singh, Stephanie Jarmul, Shelly L Miller, Peggy Reynolds, Mohammad Heidarinejad and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gina M SolomonSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Nayamin MartinezCentral California Environmental Justice Network, Fresno, CA, United States.
Julie Von BehrenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Isabella KaserTracking California, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States.
David ChangTracking California, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, United States.
Aditya SinghDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States.
Stephanie JarmulOffice of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Oakland, CA, United States.
Shelly L MillerUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States.
Peggy ReynoldsDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Mohammad HeidarinejadDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States.
Brent StephensDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States.
Brett C SingerLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Jeff WagnerEnvironmental Health Laboratory Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, United States.
John R BalmesSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-income families in dry regions, including in the Southwestern United States, frequently cool their homes with evaporative ("swamp") coolers (ECs). While inexpensive and energy efficient compared to central air conditioners, ECs pull unfiltered outdoor air into the home, creating a health hazard to occupants when wildfire smoke and heat events coincide. A community-engaged research project to reduce wildfire smoke in homes was conducted in California's San Joaquin Valley in homes of Spanish-speaking agricultural workers. A total of 88 study participants with ECs were asked about their level of satisfaction with their EC and their willingness to pay for air filtration. About 47% of participants reported dissatisfaction with their EC, with the most frequently reported reason being that it brings in dust and air pollution. Participants were highly satisfied with air cleaners and air filters that were offered to them free-of-charge. However, a willingness to pay analysis showed that air filtration solutions would not be adopted without significant subsidies; furthermore, air filtration would be an ongoing cost to participants due to the need to regularly replace filters. Short-term filtration solutions for EC users are feasible to implement and may reduce smoke exposure during wildfire events. Such solutions would need to be offered at low-or no-cost to reduce barriers to adoption. Longer term solutions include prioritizing homes with ECs in wildfire smoke exposed regions for replacement with air cooling technologies that provide clean air. Because ECs are disproportionately in low-income homes, addressing smoke intrusion through these devices is an environmental justice issue.

Indexed as

Air ConditioningDesert ClimateInhalation ExposureSmoke Inhalation InjuryWildfiresAdultAir FiltersCaliforniaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchExtreme HeatFarmersFemaleFiltrationHispanic or LatinoHousingHumansCaliforniaclimate changefarmworkerHispanicindoor air qualityPM2.5swamp cooler

Identifiers

PMID40078771
PMCPMC11897565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.