ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Bridging accessibility gaps in urban community-based basic older adult care: a comprehensive framework validated in Xi'an, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of equitable public health human resource allocation in China: a multidimensional analysis using RIF-I-OLS decomposition.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and trends of pre-hospital emergency care in Handan, China from 2011 to 2024.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Accessibility is a critical factor in ensuring equitable public services. In urban older adult care systems, resource allocation and service disparities present unique challenges. The classical "5A" theory-availability, accessibility, affordability, adaptability, and acceptability-provides a robust framework for evaluating service delivery. However, its application in urban older adult care, especially in rapidly aging societies like China, remains limited. This study aims to develop and validate a framework to address affordability, resource allocation, and service mismatches in urban older adult care systems. Methods: A web-based cross-sectional study was performed in 2023. A multi-phase methodology was adopted to construct the framework, grounded in the "5A" theory. Indicators were refined through expert consultations using the Delphi method, involving 20 experts, while the entropy weight method ensured objective indicator weighting. The framework was empirically validated in Xi'an, China, using survey data collected from 438 older adult residents across urban strata. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) method was employed to assess accessibility and identify key service gaps. Results: This study constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework for basic older adult care services (BECS), structured around 5 primary dimensions, 14 sary indicators, and 37 tertiary indicators. Empirical validation in Xi'an further demonstrates the framework's scientific rigor and practical applicability. While the framework identifies strong spatial accessibility (3.8815), it also reveals critical gaps in affordability (3.1347) and psychological care (3.0862), confirming its effectiveness in diagnosing systemic disparities and guiding policy interventions. Conclusion: This study introduces a novel accessibility evaluation framework tailored for basic older adult care services, addressing critical gaps in affordability, psychological care, and service responsiveness. Empirical results validate the framework's practicality and its alignment with the real-world conditions of urban aging societies. Furthermore, an innovative "Matching-Realization-Satisfaction" improvement pathway is proposed, offering actionable strategies to enhance accessibility and optimize service delivery. This framework serves as a replicable model for advancing equitable older adult care in rapidly aging urban communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.