ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A global survey about undiagnosed rare diseases: perspectives, challenges, and solutions.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of the diagnostic odyssey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Comparative Profiles of Pediatric Mendeliome: A Single-Center 572-Whole-Exome Sequencing Study in Xinjiang.Human heredity · 2026Article
- Referral route: a determinant of inequity for children with undiagnosed genetic diseases?Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Undiagnosed rare diseases (URDs) are a complex and multifaceted challenge, especially in low-and medium-income countries. They affect individuals with unique clinical features and lack a clear diagnostic label. Although the Undiagnosed Diseases Network International (UDNI) definition of URDs is not universally accepted, it is widely recognized. Methods: We surveyed UDNI members and participants from other countries to explore the challenges posed by URDs and identify possible solutions. Participation in the survey was completely voluntary. Results: The survey revealed a need for more consensus on a universally accepted definition for URDs. Still, the UDNI definition gained widespread recognition and serves as a valuable framework for understanding and addressing the challenges of URDs. In addition to national or international networks, fostering a more substantial engagement and resource-sharing ethos among member countries is critical. Despite advances in genomics and diagnostic tools, the diagnostic journey for people living with URDs (PLURDs) remains arduous and often inconclusive. The availability of specialized centers and the utilization of whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) vary across countries, with disparities due to healthcare systems, economic status, and government policies. Advocacy groups play a crucial role in supporting PLURDs. Conclusion: A unified commitment to prioritizing URDs on the global health agenda, paired with targeted funding, stipulated national strategies, and aligned international cooperation, is imperative to leveling the playing field for the diagnosis and management of URDs and capitalizing on the potential of Advocacy Groups as allies in this endeavor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.