Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078728›Full record

ArticleBiosafety and health2024

Evaluation of antibody responses in healthy individuals receiving SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines.

Ziyu Liu, Liyan Cai, Man Xing, Nan Qiao, Jiaojiao Liu, Xuejun Li, Chiyu Zhang, Naijun Tang, Zhelong Xu, Yingying Guo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosafety and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ziyu LiuDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Liyan CaiPhysical examination center, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China.
Man XingDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Nan QiaoDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Jiaojiao LiuDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Xuejun LiDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Chiyu ZhangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, China.
Naijun TangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Zhelong XuDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Yingying GuoDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Renfei LuClinical Laboratory, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China.
Dongming ZhouDepartment of Pathogen Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines such as CoronaVac and BBIBP-CorV have been widely used in China. However, more investigation is still needed to understand antibodies' duration and effectiveness against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants in the real world. In this study, 575 participants who had been vaccinated with two or three doses of the inactivated vaccine were recruited. Serum samples were collected and tested for anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (original strain, Dela, and Omicron). Unsurprisingly, a third dose of the vaccine significantly enhanced antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. However, despite a booster dose, the neutralizing antibody levels against Omicron, particularly the BA.5.2 subvariant, remained low. There was no sex bias, but an age bias was observed. Notably, the predominant IgG subclass antibodies were IgG1 and IgG2, with a much lower level of IgG4. After the booster shot, the ratio of IgG4 to IgG1 significantly increased. The observation of IgG1 to the IgG4 class switch after repeated inactivated vaccinations underscores the importance of continuous monitoring of subclass antibody responses. Further clinical investigations are required to understand the implications of this class switch for optimizing immunization strategies.

Indexed as

IgG subclassesInactivated vaccinesSerological studySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Variant of concern (VOC)

Identifiers

PMID40078728
PMCPMC11894967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.