Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078711›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Mapping curvature domains in human V4 using CBV-sensitive layer-fMRI at 3T.

Elisa Zamboni, Isaac Watson, Rüdiger Stirnberg, Laurentius Huber, Elia Formisano, Rainer Goebel, Aneurin J Kennerley, Antony B Morland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisa ZamboniSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Isaac WatsonYork Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Rüdiger StirnbergGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Laurentius HuberNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Elia FormisanoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Aneurin J Kennerley *Institute of Sport, Department of Sports and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Antony B Morland *York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A full understanding of how we see our world remains a fundamental research question in vision neuroscience. While topographic profiling has allowed us to identify different visual areas, the exact functional characteristics and organization of areas up in the visual hierarchy (beyond V1 & V2) is still debated. It is hypothesized that visual area V4 represents a vital intermediate stage of processing spatial and curvature information preceding object recognition. Advancements in magnetic resonance imaging hardware and acquisition techniques (e.g., non-BOLD functional MRI) now permits the capture of cortical layer-specific functional properties and organization of the human brain (including the visual system) at high precision. Methods: Here, we use functional cerebral blood volume measures to study the modularity in how responses to contours (curvature) are organized within area V4 of the human brain. To achieve this at 3 Tesla (a clinically relevant field strength) we utilize optimized high-resolution 3D-Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) Vascular Space Occupancy (VASO) measurements. Results: Data here provide the first evidence of curvature domains in human V4 that are consistent with previous findings from non-human primates. We show that VASO and BOLD tSNR maps for functional imaging align with high field equivalents, with robust time series of changes to visual stimuli measured across the visual cortex. V4 curvature preference maps for VASO show strong modular organization compared to BOLD imaging contrast. It is noted that BOLD has a much lower sensitivity (due to known venous vasculature weightings) and specificity to stimulus contrast. We show evidence that curvature domains persist across the cortical depth. The work advances our understanding of the role of mid-level area V4 in human processing of curvature and shape features. Impact: Knowledge of how the functional architecture and hierarchical integration of local contours (curvature) contribute to formation of shapes can inform computational models of object recognition. Techniques described here allow for quantification of individual differences in functional architecture of mid-level visual areas to help drive a better understanding of how changes in functional brain organization relate to difference in visual perception.

Indexed as

3 TeslacolumnscurvaturefMRIlaminarlayersVASOvisual features

Identifiers

PMID40078711
PMCPMC11897262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.