ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Electrically evoked mismatch negativity from speech stimuli as an objective measure of cochlear implant performance.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) success is often assessed using subjective tests like word recognition scores (WRS). However, these tests are unsuitable for children, non-native speakers, and individuals with cognitive impairments. Mismatch negativity (MMN), an objective measure of cortical auditory processing, offers a promising alternative for evaluating speech perception. This study aimed to assess speech perception in CI patients using MMN and examine its correlation with WRS. Methods: The study included 23 ears from CI users fitted for at least six months. Speech stimuli were presented via direct audio input to the CI processor at 70 dB nHL using an MMN paradigm. The syllables 'ba' (standard) and 'da' (deviant) served as stimuli. MMN amplitude and latency were analyzed, and their correlation with WRS was examined. Results: A significant correlation was observed between WRS and MMN responses. CI users with lower WRS scores exhibited reduced MMN amplitudes and prolonged latencies compared to those with higher scores, indicating impaired cortical speech processing. Discussion: These findings suggest that speech-induced MMN could serve as an objective tool for assessing speech perception in CI users. MMN provides valuable insights for optimizing CI fitting, particularly for patients unable to undergo subjective testing. Integrating MMN into clinical practice could improve speech perception outcomes and enhance the quality of life for CI users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.