Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078695›Full record

ReviewCambridge prisms. Extinction2023

The ethics of species extinctions.

Anna Wienhues, Patrik Baard, Alfonso Donoso, Markku Oksanen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cambridge prisms. Extinction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna WienhuesDepartment of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-9195
Patrik BaardDepartment of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2835-919X
Alfonso DonosoInstitute of Applied Ethics and Institute of Political Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-4372
Markku OksanenDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-5727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the ethics of extinctions with a focus on the Western analytical environmental ethics literature. It thereby gives special attention to the possible philosophical grounds for Michael Soulé's assertion that the untimely 'extinction of populations and species is bad'. Illustrating such debates in environmental ethics, the guiding question for this review concerns why - or when - anthropogenic extinctions are bad or wrong, which also includes the question of when that might not be the case (i.e. which extinctions are even desirable). After providing an explanation of the disciplinary perspective taken (section "Introduction"), the concept of extinction and its history within that literature are introduced (section "Understanding extinction"). Then, in section "Why (or when) might anthropogenic extinctions be morally problematic?", different reasons for why anthropogenic extinctions might be morally problematic are presented based on the loss of species' value, harm to nonhuman individuals, the loss of valuable biological variety and duties to future generations. This section concludes by also considering cases where anthropogenic extinctions might be justified. Section "How to respond to extinctions?" then addresses a selection of topics concerning risks and de-extinction technologies. Finally, the section on "Extinction studies" introduces other viewpoints on the ethics of extinction from the extinction studies literature, followed by the "Conclusion".

Indexed as

biodiversity lossde-extinctionethics and policyhuman-driven extinctionplanned extinction

Identifiers

PMID40078695
PMCPMC11895738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.