ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2024
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Craniotomy Patients: A Systematic Review.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ERAS Protocol Elements and Neurosurgery-Specific Considerations: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026Article
- Review
- Enhanced recovery after neurosurgery: a narrative review comparing clinical outcomes, protocols, and challenges with standard postoperative care.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Association of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing with cognitive function and quality of life after craniotomy for glioma resection: a retrospective comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multidisciplinary approach aimed at improving surgical outcomes, reducing complications, minimizing hospital stays, and lowering healthcare costs. Objectives: This study assesses the impact of the ERAS protocol on elective craniotomies, a routine procedure in neurosurgery. Methods: A comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 562 articles. Following strict screening criteria, 54 studies were reviewed, and ultimately 10 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected for detailed analysis. Results: The review encompassed ten studies [one prospective, one systematic review, and eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs)] published between 2016 and 2023. Key components of the ERAS protocol included preoperative counseling, high-protein intestinal nutrition, preoperative fasting while avoiding carbohydrate intake within 2 hours of surgery, standardized anesthetic and analgesic regimens, and early postoperative initiation of enteral feeding. Postoperative outcomes showed fewer complications, early mobilization, and notably shorter hospital stays, all of which contributed to improved patient recovery. Conclusions: This review demonstrates that the ERAS protocol, when applied to elective craniotomies, is effective in enhancing postoperative recovery, improving functional outcomes, and reducing hospitalization duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.