Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078592›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Biomechanical Comparison of Inside-Out and All-Inside Meniscal Repair in Controlling the Peripheral Gap and Extrusion of the Lateral Meniscus With a Complete Radial Tear: A Cadaveric Study Using a Robotic Simulator.

Kousuke Shiwaku, Hidenori Otsubo, Katsunori Takahashi, Daisuke Suzuki, Satoshi Yamakawa, Tomoaki Kamiya, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Yohei Okada, Shinichiro Okimura, Kota Watanabe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kousuke ShiwakuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hidenori OtsuboSapporo Sports Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsunori TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Daisuke SuzukiDepartment of Health Science, Hokkaido Chitose Collage of Rehabilitation, Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi YamakawaSapporo Sports Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomoaki KamiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomoyuki SuzukiDepartment of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yohei OkadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shinichiro OkimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kota WatanabeSecond Division of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiromichi FujieDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi TeramotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-9259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although both the classical inside-out and all-inside techniques are performed for the repair of complete radial tears, which should be the standard technique is, to the authors' knowledge, controversial considering the clinical outcomes and biomechanical studies. There are no biomechanical studies of repairs of the lateral meniscus (LM) evaluating the peripheral side gap (peripheral gap) of the radial tear site and extrusion of the LM, which seems to be important in the treatment of radial tears. Purpose: To compare the inside-out and all-inside meniscal repair techniques by evaluating the peripheral gap and extrusion of the LM with complete radial tear using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system and fresh-frozen cadavers. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: This study was performed using 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens, a robotic testing system, and ultrasound evaluation. Ultrasound evaluations were performed to measure peripheral gaps and extrusions. The first ultrasound evaluation under 5 N·m of valgus load was performed on the knee at 30° and 90° of flexion. After a complete radial tear at the midsegment of the LM was created, a second ultrasound evaluation under valgus load was performed. Finally, all-inside and inside-out meniscal repairs done with 1 horizontal suture were performed on the same knee in a randomized order. Subsequently, the third and fourth ultrasound evaluations under valgus load were performed. Results: The peripheral gap of the inside-out meniscal repair technique was significantly smaller than that of all-inside meniscal repairs at knee flexion angles of 30° and 90° (6.0 vs 11.5 mm and 5.6 vs 10.9 mm [both Conclusion: The inside-out meniscal repair technique showed less peripheral gap and extrusion of the LM in a complete radial tear than the all-inside meniscal repair. Inside-out repair may be advantageous for radial tears over all-inside repair because only inside-out repair can tighten the peripheral side of the radial tear. Clinical Relevance: The LM with a complete radial tear should be repaired using the inside-out technique.

Indexed as

all-insideinside-outkneemeniscal repairmeniscusperipheral gapultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40078592
PMCPMC11898229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.