ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Examining the Accuracy and Reproducibility of Responses to Nutrition Questions Related to Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Gastroenterology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: What's next?World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Benchmarking public large language model responses to patient-facing inflammatory bowel disease questions: informational quality, transparency proxies, and readability.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Nutritional Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Support Dietetic Practice Across Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Large language models for clinical decision support in gastroenterology and hepatology.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Think FAST: a novel framework to evaluate fidelity, accuracy, safety, and tone in conversational AI health coach dialogues.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- The Potential Clinical Utility of the Customized Large Language Model in Gastroenterology: A Pilot Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Generative pre-trained transformer-4 (GPT-4) is a large language model (LLM) trained on a vast corpus of data, including the medical literature. Nutrition plays an important role in managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with an unmet need for nutrition-related patient education resources. This study examines the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and reproducibility of responses by GPT-4 to patient nutrition questions related to IBD. Methods: Questions were obtained from adult IBD clinic visits, Facebook, and Reddit. Two IBD-focused registered dieticians independently graded the accuracy and reproducibility of GPT-4's responses while a third senior IBD-focused registered dietitian arbitrated. Each question was inputted twice into the model. Results: 88 questions were selected. The model correctly responded to 73/88 questions (83.0%), with 61 (69.0%) graded as comprehensive. 15/88 (17%) responses were graded as mixed with correct and incorrect/outdated data. The model comprehensively responded to 10 (62.5%) questions related to "Nutrition and diet needs for surgery," 12 (92.3%) "Tube feeding and parenteral nutrition," 11 (64.7%) "General diet questions," 10 (50%) "Diet for reducing symptoms/inflammation," and 18 (81.8%) "Micronutrients/supplementation needs." The model provided reproducible responses to 81/88 (92.0%) questions. Conclusions: GPT-4 comprehensively answered most questions, demonstrating the promising potential of LLMs as supplementary tools for IBD patients seeking nutrition-related information. However, 17% of responses contained incorrect information, highlighting the need for continuous refinement prior to incorporation into clinical practice. Future studies should emphasize leveraging LLMs to enhance patient outcomes and promoting patient and healthcare professional proficiency in using LLMs to maximize their efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.