Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078559›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2025

Deep learning-based multi-task prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multiscale whole slide images in breast cancer: A multicenter study.

Qin Wang, Feng Zhao, Haicheng Zhang, Tongpeng Chu, Qi Wang, Xipeng Pan, Yuqian Chen, Heng Zhou, Tiantian Zheng, Ziyin Li and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Qin WangSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Feng ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Haicheng ZhangBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Tongpeng ChuBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Qi WangBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Xipeng PanSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Yuqian ChenSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Heng ZhouSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Tiantian ZhengBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Ziyin LiBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Fan LinBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Haizhu XieBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Heng MaBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Lan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang 330006, China.
Lina ZhangDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 400042, China.
Qin LiDepartment of Radiology, Weifang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Weifang 262600, China.
Weiwei WangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining 272029, China.
Yi DaiDepartment of Radiology, the Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.
Ruijun TangDepartment of Pathology, Guilin Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guilin 541002, China.
Jigang WangDepartment of Pathology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266555, China.
Ping YangBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Ning MaoBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Early predicting response before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is crucial for personalized treatment plans for locally advanced breast cancer patients. We aim to develop a multi-task model using multiscale whole slide images (WSIs) features to predict the response to breast cancer NAC more finely. Methods: This work collected 1,670 whole slide images for training and validation sets, internal testing sets, external testing sets, and prospective testing sets of the weakly-supervised deep learning-based multi-task model (DLMM) in predicting treatment response and pCR to NAC. Our approach models two-by-two feature interactions across scales by employing concatenate fusion of single-scale feature representations, and controls the expressiveness of each representation via a gating-based attention mechanism. Results: In the retrospective analysis, DLMM exhibited excellent predictive performance for the prediction of treatment response, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.869 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.806-0.933] in the internal testing set and 0.841 (95% CI: 0.814-0.867) in the external testing sets. For the pCR prediction task, DLMM reached AUCs of 0.865 (95% CI: 0.763-0.964) in the internal testing and 0.821 (95% CI: 0.763-0.878) in the pooled external testing set. In the prospective testing study, DLMM also demonstrated favorable predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.754-0.903) and 0.821 (95% CI: 0.692-0.949) in treatment response and pCR prediction, respectively. DLMM significantly outperformed the baseline models in all testing sets (P<0.05). Heatmaps were employed to interpret the decision-making basis of the model. Furthermore, it was discovered that high DLMM scores were associated with immune-related pathways and cells in the microenvironment during biological basis exploration. Conclusions: The DLMM represents a valuable tool that aids clinicians in selecting personalized treatment strategies for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencebreast cancerdigital pathologywhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID40078559
PMCPMC11893347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.