ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sugar beet ( Methods: During 2019 and 2023, isolates were obtained from infected sugar beet roots showing symptoms of red-brown or black lesions and tissue necrosis. The pathogenicity of the causal organism was confirmed by Koch's postulates. The isolates were characterized based on morphological features and multilocus phylogenetic analyses. To evaluate potential control measures for this new pathogen in field conditions, the fungicides pyraclostrobin, boscalid, and fluconazole were tested for their efficacy in inhibiting the growth of this new pathogen Results: The newly discovered pathogen was found to differ from previously described taxa in conidial morphology, molecular features, and disease index. Thus, the pathogen was determined to be a new species, which we called Discussion: The discovery of this new pathogenic fungus will help researchers elucidate the pathogenesis of sugar beet root rot and provide a theoretical basis for performing targeted monitoring, preventing diseases and implementing control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.