Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078518›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2025

Designing qualitative research with value in the clinical and epidemiological context: what, why and how.

Yvette Meuleman, Eline Schade van Westrum, Willem Jan W Bos, Simon P Mooijaart, Marjolijn van Buren, Giovanni Tripepi, Vianda S Stel, Kitty J Jager, Carmine Zoccali, Friedo W Dekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yvette MeulemanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-2109
Eline Schade van WestrumDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3038-490X
Willem Jan W BosDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Simon P MooijaartDepartment of Internal Medicine, section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjolijn van BurenDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giovanni TripepiCNR-IFC, Clinical Epidemiology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Vianda S StelERA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0007-1947
Kitty J JagerERA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0444-8569
Carmine ZoccaliRenal Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-1996
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and epidemiological research is indispensable for improvements in evidence-based healthcare and health outcomes, but it also leaves important gaps in our understanding of health and illness. Qualitative research has been increasingly recognized as a key to addressing some of these gaps, using both exploratory (to gain a more complete and in-depth understanding of problems) and explanatory (to explain quantitative results) approaches. By finding out 'what's going on' and bringing people's stories to light, qualitative research is widely advocated as crucial in enhancing patient-centered research and healthcare. To date, most clinicians, clinical researchers and epidemiologists are relatively unfamiliar with and untrained in qualitative research-a type of research that, compared with quantitative research, requires different research skills and uses a different jargon, type of reasoning, and methods. This article aims to equip them with the basic knowledge necessary to appraise and design qualitative research. Specifically, we provide a comprehensive overview of (i) what qualitative research is, including various examples of qualitative research questions and explanations of the contrasting properties of quantitative and qualitative research; (ii) what constitutes the added value of qualitative research in the clinical and epidemiological context, illustrated using numerous research studies conducted within nephrology; and (iii) practical guidelines for designing qualitative research within this context, including a self-developed checklist containing essential information to include in qualitative research protocols. In doing so, we hope to enrich clinical and epidemiological research with complementary qualitative evidence-amongst others, invaluable insights into patients' lived experiences and perceptions-and thereby greatly enhance patient-centered research and evidence-based healthcare.

Indexed as

clinical researchepidemiological researchkidney diseasepatient-centered researchqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40078518
PMCPMC11897703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.