Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078503›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and technology2024

Perspectives on access to imaging digital health records in oncology: A mixed methods systematic review.

Ana S F Ribeiro, Olga Husson, Milou Reuvers, Wim J G Oyen, Christina Messiou, Winette T A van der Graaf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana S F RibeiroDepartment of Radiology Research and Artificial Intelligence, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, London, UK.
Olga HussonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Milou ReuversDepartment of Medical Oncology, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wim J G OyenHumanitas University and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.
Christina MessiouDepartment of Radiology Research and Artificial Intelligence, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, London, UK.
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital Health Records (DHR) have become essential for managing patient data, including radiology and nuclear medicine reports. The wider adoption of DHR globally presents an opportunity to improve patient engagement and empowerment through effective access and sharing of imaging investigations. This review aims to synthesize literature on views, experiences, expectations, and preferences of oncology patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) when accessing imaging via DHR. Materials and Methods: This review was conducted using recommended Cochrane Handbook databases (registration: CRD42021213808), focusing on English articles published from 2000 onwards. Three experienced reviewers critically appraised selected articles, thematic analysis and narrative synthesis were used to extract data. Results: 493 unique articles were identified, with 451 excluded, resulting in 42 articles assessed for eligibility. Nine studies were included, eight from the USA, one from Canada, published between 2010 and 2020. Findings suggest patient portals can positively impact patient and HCP engagement, and patients desire access to their imaging reports. Factors such as timing of access, adequate consultation time, resources for HCP to discuss findings, and format of information are critical considerations that influence both patient and HCP perceptions and preferences. Conclusion: Oncology patients want timely and understandable access to their imaging records. To ensure this, it is crucial to explore the appropriate timing, format, and methods to discuss these findings with patients. By involving all stakeholders in the planning process, we can develop DHR systems that provide personalised support for patients to manage their complex imaging results.

Indexed as

Digital health recordsHealthcare professionalsImaging recordsOncology patients

Identifiers

PMID40078503
PMCPMC11893476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.