ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025
Impact of Short-Acting Spinal Anesthetic on Discharge from Postanesthetic Care Unit: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chloroprocaine has recently regained accessibility as a short-acting local anesthetic in Canada. It offers an alternative to bupivacaine, the predominant spinal anesthetic used at Vancouver Coastal Health sites in Vancouver, British Columbia. Objective: To compare the recovery profile of surgical patients who received either chloroprocaine or bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study involved adult patients who received chloroprocaine or bupivacaine as spinal anesthetic for short-duration surgery. The primary outcome was the time from admission to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to discharge from the PACU. Time from PACU admission to discharge readiness was also assessed, along with the perioperative variables of type of operation performed, duration of surgery, dose of anesthetic, dose of intraoperative analgesic, and number of days from operation to hospital discharge. Results: The study involved 145 patients aged 30 to 94 years: 72 who received chloroprocaine and 73 who received bupivacaine. For the primary outcome, there was a nonsignificant shorter time from PACU admission to discharge for the chloroprocaine cohort (mean difference 36 minutes, Conclusion: Use of chloroprocaine was associated with earlier time to patients meeting PACU discharge criteria. These findings support the potential benefit of chloroprocaine over bupivacaine in terms of achieving earlier PACU discharge readiness, although this difference did not consistently translate into earlier actual PACU discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.