ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Prognostic value of c-MET in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a study based on the mRNA expression in TCGA database and a meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor's (c-MET) prognostic value in oesophageal carcinoma (ESCA) through a meta-analysis and bioinformatics. Methods: We analysed c-MET expression in ESCA tissues using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate its association with clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes. The meta-analysis included studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) for survival and metastatic outcomes. Results: The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis revealed elevated c-MET expression in ESCA, which was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, tumour grade and stage, though not with overall survival (OS). In the meta-analysis, 278 publications were identified, and 89 duplicates were removed. After screening, 176 articles were excluded, leaving 13 for full-text review. Of these, 5 studies lacked sufficient survival data, resulting in 8 eligible studies with a total of 1,488 patients. Meta-analysis findings indicated that high c-MET expression was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.01; Conclusion: High c-MET expression is associated with poor prognosis and advanced disease in ESCA, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for risk stratification. Further studies are needed to confirm its prognostic value and explore therapeutic implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.