ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Antiepileptic drugs and foetal disorders: analysis of 20-year data from the pharmacovigilance center.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lacosamide Safety During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Single-Centre Experience and Comprehensive Narrative Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Global temporal trends and projections of epilepsy in women of childbearing age: insights from the global burden of disease study 2021.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Adverse effects of antiseizure medications: a review of the impact of pharmacogenetics and drugs interactions in clinical practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For women of childbearing age, the risks of uncontrolled epilepsy to the mother and fetus need to be balanced against the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The combined use of different types of AEDs has become a potential treatment option for the effective control of epileptic symptoms, while different studies present significant difference between the combined use of AEDs and foetal toxicity, which need a large comprehensive study to clarify the relation. Objective: The study aims to analyze data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to explore the impact of monotherapy or polytherapy of AEDs on foetal and infant disorders. Methods: Bayesian analysis and non-proportional methods were employed to assess the association between AED use and foetal disorders based on the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The clinical characteristics and outcome of patients were also investigated. Results: The study identified significant correlation between foetal disorders and the first and second generation AEDs, with RORs of 3.8 and 4.9, respectively. Valproic acid monotherapy showed the highest correlation with foetal disorders (ROR = 15.8, PRR = 16.3, IC025 = 3.8) and was uniquely associated with male reproductive toxicity. The risk of foetal disorders associated with combination therapies varied depending on the specific AEDs combination, with some increasing and others decreasing the risk compared to monotherapy. Conclusion: The analysis of the reports from FAERS database identified correlation between foetal disorders and AEDs and provided a comprehensive overview of the incidence and prognosis of different AEDs monotherapy and combination, which may provide some advice for the selection of drug for women of childbearing age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.