ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Signal mining and analysis of ripretinib adverse events: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- Post-marketing safety signals, therapeutic failure, and product-use issues reported with injectable Cabenuva: A FAERS disproportionality analysis.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Comparative real-world safety profiles of caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS and VigiAccess databases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance analysis of central nervous system adverse events associated with sevoflurane and drug interactions: a disproportionality study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ripretinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who have previously received treatment with at least three kinase inhibitors. The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse events(AEs) associated with ripretinib using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) related to of ripretinib from 2020 Q2 to 2024 Q2 were extracted from the FAERS database. This study used the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) for disproportionality analysis. In addition, this research also performed a descriptive analysis of the time-to-onset (TTO) of AEs related to ripretinib. Results: A total of 3,513 ICSRs with ripretinib as the primary suspect (PS) were retrieved from the FAERS database. At the preferred term(PT) level, this study detected 116 positive AEs. Common AEs included alopecia, constipation, muscle spasms, dry skin, decreased appetite. Notably, unexpected AEs such as pleural mass, blood magnesium abnormal, blood potassium abnormal, hepatic lesion, and liver abscess were also observed. The median time to onset of ripretinib-related AEs was 102 days (29-254 days), with the majority of AEs occurring during the first month of treatment. Conclusion: This study identified some known AEs associated with ripretinib and discovered unexpected AEs, providing preliminary insights into its safety in the real world. This information is valuable for clinical monitoring and the safe use of ripretinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.