ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025
An in-depth review on utilizing ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessing the iridocorneal angle and ciliary body in canines.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior Segment Measurements in Normal Cats Using Ultrasound Biomicroscopy.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Atropine-induced intraocular pressure changes and anterior segment structural parameters in dogs assessed by ultrasound biomicroscopy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Comparative morphological analysis of the zonular apparatus in porcine, feline, and canine species.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we explore the transformative role of Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) in veterinary ophthalmology, focusing on its utility in evaluating the iridocorneal angle and ciliary body in dogs. We begin by outlining UBM's foundational principles, providing a holistic understanding of its operational mechanics. This is followed by an exploration of the techniques and considerations for optimal UBM imaging, including the use of topical anesthesia, probe positioning, and maintaining a controlled measurement environment. A major section is dedicated to the detailed anatomy of the anterior segment, emphasizing the iridocorneal angle and ciliary body in controlling aqueous humor dynamics within canine and feline eyes. By comparing anatomical structures in humans and animals, we highlight the need for distinct parameters in veterinary medicine. The review also analyzes the parameters obtainable via UBM, emphasizing its potential in monitoring drug-induced ocular changes, gaging post-cataract surgical outcomes, and observing inter-species variations. We conclude by encapsulating the current state of research, addressing existing challenges, and suggesting future research avenues. This synthesis underscores the pivotal role of UBM in advancing veterinary ophthalmic diagnostics and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.