SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
AI models for the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new era of precision diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer: artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data integration and clinical applications.Cell death & disease · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.BMC medical genomics · 2026Review
- Integrating Blood-Based Immune-Inflammation Biomarkers into Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prognostic Models in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advancements in nanobiosensors for early cancer detection, challenges, treatment, and future prospects: a comprehensive review.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Recent Advances in Diagnosis, Biomarker Discovery, and Drug Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a CT-based radiomics-deep learning signature for non-invasive prediction of PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven gastrointestinal functional assessment: multimodal imaging, digital biomarkers, and real-time monitoring.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Global disparities in access to diagnostics and therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to delivery - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The application of AI-driven and engineered intratumoral microbes in cancer therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to address immune response heterogeneity in low-dose radiation therapy.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Frontiers in thoracic oncology: new breakthroughs in molecular targets and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- AI-Powered histopathology slide image interpretation in oncology: A comprehensive knowledge mapping and bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) models in identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer. With the increasing complexity of lung cancer subtypes and the need for personalized treatment strategies, AI-driven approaches offer a promising avenue for biomarker discovery and clinical decision-making. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases to identify relevant studies published up to date. Studies investigating AI models for the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer were included. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse AI methodologies and biomarker targets. AI models, particularly deep learning and machine learning algorithms demonstrated high accuracy in predicting biomarker status. Most of the studies developed models for the prediction of EGFR, followed by PD-L1 and ALK biomarkers in lung cancer. Internal and external validation techniques confirmed the robustness and generalizability of AI-driven predictions across heterogeneous patient cohorts. According to our results, the pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity of AI models for the prediction of biomarkers of lung cancer were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72 - 0.82) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78 - 0.84). Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the significant potential of AI models in facilitating non-invasive assessment of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in lung cancer. By enhancing diagnostic accuracy and guiding treatment selection, AI-driven approaches have the potential to revolutionize personalized oncology and improve patient outcomes in lung cancer management. Further research is warranted to validate and optimize the clinical utility of AI-driven biomarkers in large-scale prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.