ArticleEnvironmental justice (Print)2025
Empowering Citizens Through the Development and Deployment of a Community-Based Environmental Health Reporting Tool.
Article in Environmental justice (Print), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communicating with Community: Using Geographic Information Systems to Convey the Impacts of Extreme Heat in Los Angeles Environmental Justice Communities.Environmental justice (Print) · 2026Article
- Spatial distribution of persistent components of particulate matter near a hazardous waste thermal treatment facility.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2026Article
- Persistent chemicals in particulate matter (PM) near a hazardous waste thermal treatment facility.Atmospheric pollution research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory research provides communities with an avenue to actively collaborate with environmental researchers. The research aims to gain insight into critical problems of concern to community members while maintaining community autonomy over the research and its outcomes. This article describes the development and implementation of an environmental health communication tool designed to meet the needs of residents of Colfax, Louisiana, a rural community with limited technological access, which is engaging in advocacy with federal and state regulatory agencies to prohibit open burning and open detonation of military and Superfund wastes at a nearby thermal treatment site. We discuss how environmental scientists: (a) designed a community reporting tool specific to community goals and needs, (b) incorporated science and health communication practices, and (c) paired the tool with community outreach activities to support community-based environmental justice efforts. The reporting tool was evaluated with regard to Universal Design for Learning criteria. The tool was found to include key principles, including multiple means of representation, multiple means of action and expression, and multiple means of engagement. Consistent with these principles, several community members expressed that the booklets provided a concise and understandable summary of the data for use in their advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.