Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078167›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2025

Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse.

Antonio Desiderio, Anna Mancini, Giulio Cimini, Riccardo Di Clemente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio DesiderioPhysics Department and INFN, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9971-450X
Anna ManciniPhysics Department and INFN, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0705-1252
Giulio CiminiPhysics Department and INFN, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-8597
Riccardo Di ClementeComplex Connections Lab, Network Science Institute, Northeastern University London, 58 St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1LP, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-6351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People nowadays express their opinions in online spaces, using different forms of interactions such as posting, sharing, and discussing with one another. How do these digital traces change in response to events happening in the real world? We leverage Reddit conversation data, exploiting its community-based structure, to elucidate how offline events influence online user interactions and behavior. Online conversations, as posts and comments, are analyzed along their temporal and semantic dimensions. Conversations tend to become repetitive with a more limited vocabulary, develop at a faster pace, and feature heightened emotions. As the event approaches, the shifts occurring in conversations are reflected in the users' dynamics. Users become more active, and they exchange information with a growing audience, despite using a less rich vocabulary and repetitive messages. The recurring patterns we discovered are persistent across a wide range of events and several contexts, representing a fingerprint of how online dynamics change in response to real-world occurrences.

Indexed as

computational social sciencedigital discoursehuman interactionsonline social media

Identifiers

PMID40078167
PMCPMC11897697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.