ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025
Optimizing experimental designs for model selection of ion channel drug-binding mechanisms.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing experimental designs for model selection of ion channel drug-binding mechanisms.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
- A range of voltage-clamp protocol designs for rapid capture of hERG kinetics.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid delayed rectifier current carried by the human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene (hERG) channel is susceptible to drug-induced reduction, which can lead to an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia. Establishing the mechanism by which a specific drug compound binds to hERG can help reduce uncertainty when quantifying pro-arrhythmic risk. In this study, we introduce a methodology for optimizing experimental voltage protocols to produce data that enable different proposed models for the drug-binding mechanism to be distinguished. We demonstrate the performance of this methodology via a synthetic data study. If the underlying model of hERG current is known exactly, then the optimized protocols generated show noticeable improvements in our ability to select the true model when compared with a simple protocol used in previous studies. However, if the model is not known exactly, and we assume a discrepancy between the data-generating hERG model and the hERG model used in fitting the models, then the optimized protocols become less effective in determining the 'true' binding dynamics. While the introduced methodology shows promise, we must be careful to ensure that, if applied to a real data study, we have a well-calibrated model of hERG current gating.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.