Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078142›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025

Emulating computer models with high-dimensional count output.

James M Salter, Trevelyan J McKinley, Xiaoyu Xiong, Daniel B Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emulating computer models with high-dimensional count output.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James M SalterDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7428-6465
Trevelyan J McKinleyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Xiaoyu XiongDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Daniel B WilliamsonDepartment of Economics, Land Environment Economics and Policy Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer models are used to study the real world, and often contain a large number of uncertain input parameters, produce a large number of outputs, may be expensive to run and need calibrating to real-world observations to be useful for decision-making. Emulators are often used as cheap surrogates for the expensive simulator, trained on a small number of simulations to provide predictions with uncertainty at unseen inputs. In epidemiological applications, for example compartmental or agent-based models for modelling the spread of infectious diseases, the output is usually spatially and temporally indexed, stochastic and consists of counts rather than continuous variables. Here, we consider emulating high-dimensional count output from a complex computer model using a Poisson lognormal PCA (PLNPCA) emulator. We apply the PLNPCA emulator to output fields from a COVID-19 model for England and Wales and compare this to fitting emulators to aggregations of the full output. We show that performance is generally comparable, while the PLNPCA emulator inherits desirable properties, including allowing the full output to be predicted while capturing correlations between outputs, providing high-dimensional samples of counts that are representative of the true model output.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.

Indexed as

basis emulationGaussian processesPoisson lognormaluncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID40078142
PMCPMC11904617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.