Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078120›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

My Week of Denial and Disorientation: A Lived Experience Narrative of a Stay in a Psychiatric Emergency Department.

Emilie Hudson, Lewys Beames

Abstract readPersonal Narrative
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emilie HudsonFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-1034
Lewys BeamesKing's College London, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-8516

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric emergency departments (EDs) are common settings in which patients receive crisis care, yet their experiences in these environments remain understudied.

aimThis lived experience narrative recounts the first author's week-long stay in a psychiatric ED, providing insight into the experiences and challenges of inpatient psychiatric care.

methodsThe first author used a narrative approach to develop a series of vignettes that captured significant moments of her inpatient experience. Both authors reflected on these experiences, drawing on professional expertise and existing literature.

findingsThe narrative reveals a lack of communication on the unit, power imbalances between patients and staff and the dismissal of patients' concerns, experiences and identities. It illustrates how patients' behaviours are often misinterpreted, contributing to further distress and disempowerment. DISCUSSION: The authors examine systemic problems in mental health care, such as epistemic injustice, the dominance of the biomedical model and restrictive control over patient autonomy. They argue for the need to shift to a more compassionate, pluralistic and trauma-informed approach to mental health care.

conclusionThis narrative highlights the need for reforms in emergency psychiatric care. By centring patients' voices, mental health services can foster a more respectful and healing environment for people in crisis.

Indexed as

Denial, PsychologicalEmergency Services, PsychiatricInpatientsPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansNarrationlived experiencemental health crisismental health nursingpsychiatric care

Identifiers

PMID40078120
PMCPMC12233038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.