ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2025
Prognostic factors in bushfire-affected koalas-Kangaroo Island bushfire response 2020.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective Analysis of Triage and Hospitalisation Records for Bushfire-Affected Koalas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Easy rescues, difficult decisions: Advancing the ethical dialogue in wildlife triage, treatment and rehabilitation.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Review
- Prognostic factors in bushfire-affected koalas-Kangaroo Island bushfire response 2020.Australian veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Systemic antibiotic use in fire-affected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the 2019-2020 wildfires.Australian veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a retrospective analysis of clinical records data from koalas presenting for treatment following the large-scale bushfire event on Kangaroo Island 2019-2020. The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors for koalas affected by bushfire. Koalas (n = 199) were grouped based on their burn status in combination with their burn bandaging requirement at triage; those with no burns, with burns that did not require bandaging and with burns that did require bandaging. Overall, 59.8% of koalas had positive outcomes, but this reduced to only 13% of koalas in the most severely affected group (burns that were bandaged). Negative outcomes were found to be associated with several factors, including the timing of presentation, with the worst affected animals presenting in the first 2 weeks of the operation. Also, an increasing number of bandage changes during hospitalisation led to increasingly negative outcomes, with no positive outcomes beyond three bandage changes. In addition, clear associations were found with patterns of burns on feet, with only 4% positive outcomes for animals with all 4 feet burnt. All bandaged koalas with severe dehydration had negative outcomes and body weights decreased over time for hospitalised animals from the most severely affected bandaged burn group. Mild serum sodium concentration elevation at triage was the only clinically significant blood abnormality for koalas with bandaged burns. Overall, this study identified key prognostic factors, particularly bandaging requirements and the number of feet burnt, that will enable more effective decision-making at triage and improve animal welfare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.