ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Comparing 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations in young, physically active females: Insights from plasma versus serum analysis.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations in young, physically active females: Insights from plasma versus serum analysis.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Larger-volume capillary blood sampling is a valid alternative to assess progesterone and 17ß-estradiol for cycle phase identification in tactical female athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serum measurements of 17β-estradiol and progesterone are widely used to verify menstrual cycle status and confirm contraceptive use, often through commercially available immunoassay kits. However, no studies have investigated whether blood collection tube chemistries influence hormone concentrations in young females, despite assays permitting the use of different biofluids with similar reference ranges. In this study, venous blood was sampled from physically active females (n = 25) using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and serum vacutainers, and 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations were measured using competitive immunoenzymatic assays. Median plasma concentrations of 17β-estradiol and progesterone were 44.2% (plasma 40.75 vs. serum 28.25 pg/ml) and 78.9% (plasma 1.70 vs. serum 0.95 ng/ml) higher than serum concentrations, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Strong positive correlations were observed between plasma and serum concentrations for 17β-estradiol (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and progesterone (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). The mean bias and limits of agreement for plasma versus serum were 12.5 pg/ml (-20.6 to 45.5 pg/ml) for 17β-estradiol and 1.01 ng/ml (-5.6 to 7.6 ng/ml) for progesterone. Ovarian hormone levels were consistently higher in EDTA plasma compared with serum, with these matrices not yielding statistically equivalent results. Despite these differences, the strong correlations and good agreement suggest that both matrices are suitable for biomarker analysis. Researchers using EDTA plasma should account for the higher hormone concentrations when applying inclusion or exclusion criteria, because adjustments might be necessary to ensure appropriate participant classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.