Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077890›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2025

Hypnogram and Hypnodensity Analysis of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder Using Both EEG and HRV-Based Sleep Staging Models.

Jaap F van der Aar, Merel M van Gilst, Daan A van den Ende, Hans van Gorp, Peter Anderer, Angelique Pijpers, Pedro Fonseca, Elisabetta Peri, Sebastiaan Overeem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaap F van der AarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-5144
Merel M van GilstDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-5686
Daan A van den EndePhilips Innovation & Strategy, Department of Innovation Engineering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Hans van GorpDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-2874
Peter AndererThe Siesta Group Schlafanalyse Gmbh, Vienna, Austria.
Angelique PijpersCenter for Sleep Medicine Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands.
Pedro FonsecaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Elisabetta PeriDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan OvereemDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a primary sleep disorder strongly associated with Parkinson's disease. Assessing sleep structure in RBD is important for understanding the underlying pathophysiology and developing diagnostic methods. However, the performance of automated sleep stage classification (ASSC) models is considered suboptimal in RBD, for both models utilising neurological signals ("ExG": EEG, EOG, and chin EMG) and heart rate variability combined with body movements (HRVm). Here, we explore this underperformance through the categorical representation of sleep macrostructure (i.e., hypnogram) and a representation that leverages the underlying probability distribution of ASSCs (i.e., hypnodensity). By comparing the RBD population (n = 36) to a sex- and age-matched group of OSA patients chosen for their anticipated similarly decreased sleep stability, we confirm lower 4-stage classification performance in both ExG-based ASSC (RBD: κ = 0.74, OSA: κ = 0.80) and HRVm-based ASSC (RBD: κ = 0.50, OSA: κ = 0.63). Stages showing lower agreement in RBD, namely, N1 + N2 and REM sleep, exhibited elevated ambiguity in the hypnodensity, indicating more ambiguous classification distributions. Limited differences in bout durations between RBD and OSA suggested sleep instability is not necessarily driving lower agreement in RBD. However, stage transitions in OSA showed more abrupt changes in the underlying probability distribution, while RBD transitions had a more continuous profile, possibly complicating classification. Although both ExG-based and HRVm-based automated sleep staging in RBD remain challenging, hypnodensity analysis is informative for the characterisation of (RBD) sleep and can capture potential drivers of classification disagreement.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyHeart RateREM Sleep Behavior DisorderSleep StagesAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyelectroencephalographyhypnodensityobstructive sleep apneaphotoplethysmographyREM sleep behaviour disordersleep structure

Identifiers

PMID40077890
PMCPMC12426719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.