Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077886›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025

Exploring Microbiological Dynamics in a Salt Cavern for Potential Hydrogen Storage Use.

Nicole Dopffel, Kyle Mayers, Abduljelil Kedir, Biwen Annie An-Stepec, Janiche Beeder, Silvan Hoth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecological plasticity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole DopffelNORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-9579
Kyle MayersNORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, Bergen, Norway.
Abduljelil KedirNORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, Bergen, Norway.
Biwen Annie An-StepecNORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, Bergen, Norway.
Janiche BeederEquinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway.
Silvan HothEquinor ASA, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

Equinor ASA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogen storage in salt caverns is important for supporting the energy transition. However, there is limited knowledge about microbial communities within these caverns and associated risks of hydrogen loss. In this study we characterised a salt-saturated brine from a salt cavern and found a high sulphate content (4.2 g/L) and low carbon content (84.9 mg/L inorganic, 7.61 mg/L organic). The brine contained both Bacteria and Archaea, and 16S rRNA gene analysis revealed a halophilic community with members of Acetohalobium, Thiohalorhabdus, Salinibacter and up to 40% of unknown sequences. Within the Archaea, Euryarchaeota and the symbiotic Nanohaloarcheaota were dominant. Growth experiments showed that some microbes are resistant to autoclaving and pass through 0.22 μm filters. Heyndrickxia-related colonies grew on aerobic plates up to 10% salt, indicating the presence of inactive spores. The highest anaerobic activity was observed at 30°C, including glucose- and yeast extract fermentation, hydrogen-oxidation, lactate-utilisation, methane- and acetate-formation and sulphate-reduction, which was observed up to 80°C. However, microbial activity was slow, with incubations taking up to 1 year to measure microbial products. This study indicates that artificial salt caverns are an extreme environment containing potential hydrogen-consuming microbes.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaHydrogenPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSaltsSulfatesbrineHydrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSaltsSulfateshydrogen underground storagemethanogenesissalt cavernssulphate reducing microbes

Identifiers

PMID40077886
PMCPMC11903319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.