Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077875›Full record

ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2025

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests after subacromial lidocaine injection and ultrasonography for evaluating supraspinatus tendon disorder.

Jansen Lee, Andri Maruli Tua Lubis, Iman Widya Aminata, Renaldi Prasetia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jansen LeeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Andri Maruli Tua LubisDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Iman Widya AminataDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fatmawati General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Renaldi PrasetiaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate pathoanatomic diagnosis of the cause of shoulder pain cannot rely solely on clinical tests. Similarly, diagnosis based on imaging results alone is not reliable due to the high prevalence of asymptomatic pathology. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of clinical testing with lidocaine injection and ultrasonography as a screening method for detecting supraspinatus disorders compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsPatients with supraspinatus-related shoulder pain were collected from outpatient clinics. Clinical tests, ultrasonography, and subacromial lidocaine injections were performed, with tests repeated post-injection. The results were confirmed with MRI findings.

resultsOf 78 patients, the average age was 58±6 years, with 76.9% being normal weight females. Moderate shoulder pain was reported by 75.6% of participants, predominantly on the dominant right side (84.6%), with a significant correlation (P<0.05). The Hawkins-Kennedy test (0.73) and Neer sign (0.68) had the best sensitivity, while the drop arm test (0.93) showed the highest specificity for tendon pathology. For full-thickness tears, the Hawkins-Kennedy and empty can test (0.76) had the best sensitivity, and the drop arm test (0.82) had the best specificity. Lidocaine injection reduced sensitivity but increased specificity, with the drop arm test reaching 0.96. Supraspinatus ultrasonography was over 90% accurate compared with MRI, with a kappa value above 0.7.

conclusionsSubacromial lidocaine injection reduces sensitivity but increases the specificity of clinical tests for supraspinatus tendon disorders. Ultrasonography can be used as a screening tool for supraspinatus tendon abnormalities. Level of evidence: IV.

Indexed as

Clinical testDiagnostic accuracyLidocaine injectionSupraspinatus tendonUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40077875
PMCPMC11938918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.