ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2025
Outcomes of footprint medialization and bone marrow stimulation in chronic retracted rotator cuff tears.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Structural Outcomes With Acellular Dermal Matrix Patch Augmentation Versus Single-Row Repair in Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Footprint medialization with bone marrow stimulation versus conventional incomplete repair for chronic retracted rotator cuff tears.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of chronic retracted rotator cuff tears where complete footprint coverage cannot be achieved, using two treatments: footprint medialization with bone marrow stimulation and conventional incomplete repair.
methodsThis retrospective study included 87 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with incomplete footprint coverage. The included patients were divided into group 1 (54 patients with footprint medialization and bone marrow stimulation) and group 2 (33 patients with conventional repair). Medialization and bone marrow stimulation were performed if the tendon did not cover a footprint of ≥1 cm2. Clinical outcomes, including a visual analog scale for pain score, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley score, and patient satisfaction, were evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up. Radiological healing was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography arthrography at 6 months and ultrasound at 2 years.
resultsBoth groups showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes from preoperative levels. Group 1 demonstrated better outcomes in all measures at the final follow-up than group 2. Active range of motion improved significantly in both groups, with no significant postoperative differences. At 2 years postoperatively, group 1 had a significantly lower retear rate (14.8%) than group 2 (36.4%) (P=0.020).
conclusionsIn this study, the group that underwent footprint medialization and bone marrow stimulation for chronic retracted rotator cuff tears, in which complete footprint coverage was not possible, exhibited a lower retear rate and better clinical outcomes than the group that underwent conventional incomplete repair, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.