Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077858›Full record

ArticleNursing inquiry2025

Beyond Competency: Developing Critical Digital Capabilities in Nursing Students Through Freirean Pedagogy.

Matthew Oliver Wynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Active Learning and Professional Citizenship in Nursing Education: A Structural Account.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew Oliver WynnSchool of Nursing and Advanced Practice, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9021-4747

Funding

The author received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digitalisation of healthcare is transforming nursing practice, presenting unique opportunities and challenges that demand more than technical competence from nursing professionals. Despite the growing integration of digital tools, nursing remains in the 'foothills of digital transformation', with significant gaps in the critical and theoretical frameworks required to navigate this shift effectively. This article explores how Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy may address these gaps by fostering critical digital skills in nursing students. Drawing on Freire's concepts of problem-posing education, conscientization, dialogue and praxis, the article proposes a pedagogical model that encourages students to critically examine the socio-political and ethical implications of digital tools within their practice. By aligning Freirean principles with contemporary nursing challenges, the article argues for a shift away from solely competency-based frameworks toward educational approaches that promote reflective, dialogical, and ethically informed engagement with technology. The limitations of Freirean pedagogy, including its difficulty in evidencing direct outcomes, are discussed alongside its potential to cultivate a philosophically engaged nursing workforce capable of navigating the complexities of a digital healthcare environment and its associated impact on the profession. This approach underscores the importance of preserving nursing's core ethical and relational values while embracing the transformative potential of digital technologies.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDigital TechnologyStudents, NursingTeachingEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateHumanseducationnurse educationsocial theory

Identifiers

PMID40077858
PMCPMC11903917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.