Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077769›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

Baby-Led Weaning vs. Traditional Complementary Feeding-Differences in Feeding Practices Among Polish Children Aged 6-36 Months-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Agnieszka Białek-Dratwa, Kinga Dawid, Wiktoria Staśkiewicz-Bartecka, Agata Kiciak, Oskar Kowalski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnieszka Białek-DratwaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Department of Dietetics, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-6424
Kinga DawidDepartment of Human Nutrition, Department of Dietetics, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Wiktoria Staśkiewicz-BarteckaDepartment of Food Technology and Quality Assessment, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-5935
Agata KiciakDepartment of Food Technology and Quality Assessment, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-2038
Oskar KowalskiDepartment of Human Nutrition, Department of Dietetics, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, ul. Jordana 19, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.

Funding

Medical University of Silesia BNW-1-136/N/3/Z - "Feeding neophobia and feeding disorders among infants and children".
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary feeding involves introducing additional foods to a child's diet, influenced by the child's age, developmental stage, and skills, such as sucking, swallowing, and chewing. The WHO and ESPGHAN recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, with the gradual introduction of complementary foods thereafter. The baby-led weaning (BLW) method emphasises self-feeding and the early introduction of solid foods, fostering independence and development. This study aimed to evaluate the mode of complementary feeding in children aged 6-36 months, considering the BLW method. MATERIAL AND

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among the parents of children aged 6-36 months using a Google Forms questionnaire distributed through social media. The study included 1027 participants, with 1017 mother-child pairs meeting the inclusion criteria. The questionnaire covered demographic data, feeding methods, and detailed questions on complementary feeding practices, including BLW. The study included children fed using the baby-led weaning method during supplementary feeding (BLW-baby-led weaning) and children not using the BLW method (NoBLW-no baby-led weaning).

resultsThis study found significant differences between the BLW and NoBLW groups in terms of feeding methods and outcomes. BLW children were more often exclusively breastfed (68.9% vs. 58.7%) and started complementary feeding later (79.9% between 6 and 7 months). Adverse events in the BLW group included gagging (64.8%), spitting out food (77.1%), and choking (12.3%), with rare cases requiring medical intervention (0.2%). Children using BLW showed greater autonomy in their eating decisions and had more frequent exposure to varied food textures.

conclusionsChildren using the BLW method were more likely to be breastfed, had more contact with various textures, and were less likely to consume milk formula and pudding-type products. BLW, despite the risk of choking, is safe under supervision and supports motor development and healthy eating habits. The BLW method has the potential to support healthy eating habits and child independence, but its use requires parental education about safety and appropriate food choices. Further research should focus on the long-term effects of this method, especially in terms of its impact on children's eating habits, motor development, and health at an older age.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFeeding MethodsInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaWeaningBreast FeedingChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePolandSurveys and Questionnairesbaby-led weaningchildren’s dietcomplementary feedingneophobia

Identifiers

PMID40077769
PMCPMC11901614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.