Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077728›Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

The Detrimental Impact of Ultra-Processed Foods on the Human Gut Microbiome and Gut Barrier.

Debora Rondinella, Pauline Celine Raoul, Eleonora Valeriani, Irene Venturini, Marco Cintoni, Andrea Severino, Francesca Sofia Galli, Vincenzina Mora, Maria Cristina Mele, Giovanni Cammarota and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Debora RondinellaDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-5094
Pauline Celine RaoulClinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-1082
Eleonora ValerianiDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Irene VenturiniDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Marco CintoniClinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9610-0748
Andrea SeverinoDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesca Sofia GalliDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzina MoraDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina MeleDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-7062
Giovanni CammarotaDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6230-1779
Emanuele RinninellaClinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9165-2367
Gianluca IaniroDepartment of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8318-0515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have become a widely consumed food category in modern diets. However, their impact on gut health is raising increasing concerns. This review investigates how UPFs impact the gut microbiome and gut barrier, emphasizing gut dysbiosis and increased gut permeability. UPFs, characterized by a high content of synthetic additives and emulsifiers, and low fiber content, are associated with a decrease in microbial diversity, lower levels of beneficial bacteria like

Indexed as

Fast FoodsFood HandlingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeDietDietary FiberDysbiosisFood, ProcessedHumansInflammationProbioticsDietary Fibergut barriergut microbiomeultra-processed foods (UPFs)

Identifiers

PMID40077728
PMCPMC11901572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.