Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077590›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Gender Differences in Protein Consumption and Body Composition: The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Dietary Choices.

Mauro Lombardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Serum uric acid levels and longitudinal change in cognitive function in older adults: a sex-stratified population-based study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mauro LombardoDepartment for the Promotion of Human Science and Quality of Life, San Raffaele Open University, Via di Val Cannuta, 247, 00166 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7509-5487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGender differences in eating habits and protein consumption patterns are determined by cultural, socio-economic, and behavioural factors. Men tend to consume more meat, while women prefer plant-based proteins; however, the impact of these choices on body composition remains unclear.

objectivesThis study explores gender differences in protein consumption and the influence of socioeconomic status on dietary choices, evaluating their potential association with body composition parameters, including fat mass (FM%) and fat-free mass (FFM%).

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 1708 Italian adults (721 males, 987 females). Food intake was assessed using a validated 7-day food diary. Participants were classified as non-consumers, low consumers, or high consumers according to the median intake of each protein source. Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

resultsMeat and processed meat consumption was significantly higher in men (

conclusionsGender differences in protein consumption persist across socioeconomic levels and are related to body composition. Meat consumption is culturally linked to masculinity, whereas plant-based proteins are more commonly consumed by women. Understanding these dietary patterns can inform targeted nutritional interventions that promote balanced and sustainable diets.

Indexed as

body compositiondietary habitsfat-free massfat massgender differencesmeat intakenutritional epidemiologyplant-based proteinsprotein consumptionsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40077590
PMCPMC11899518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.