Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077565›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Using Bran of Ancient and Old Grains for Wheat Bread Production.

Oumayma Toumi, Costantino Fadda, Alessandra Del Caro, Paola Conte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oumayma ToumiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4816-4314
Costantino FaddaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-9079
Alessandra Del CaroDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-8535
Paola ConteDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia, 39/A, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-924X

Funding

Università degli Studi di Sassari Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2020: FAR2020FADDAC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current era of heightened awareness regarding the impact of food choices, there has been a noticeable shift towards revisiting traditional ingredients. Following the growing interest in ancient grains, this study evaluated their potential use for enriching modern wheat dough and bread. The effects of substituting 20% of wheat flour with the bran of seven ancient grains on dough's rheological properties and bread quality were assessed. The bran-enriched doughs maintained high stability (ST) values and showed an enhanced elastic behavior compared to the control. Nonetheless, a reduction in dough extensibility (E) was also noted. In terms of bread measurements, all bran-enriched breads exhibited a lower specific volume and a darker crust and crumb compared to the control bread. However, not all of the bran breads showed a harder and chewier loaf texture. The composite breads also exhibited enhanced total dietary fiber (TDF) and polyphenol content. A sensory evaluation revealed that Garfagnana (GAR) and Norberto (NOR) bran-breads received the highest overall liking scores. In conclusion, the incorporation of ancient grain brans presents a promising approach to enhancing modern wheat doughs and breads, offering nutritional benefits without significantly compromising their sensory and textural properties.

Indexed as

ancient grainsbraneinkornemmerlandracessensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40077565
PMCPMC11898424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.