Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077544›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Cross-Cultural Comparison (13 Countries) of Consumers' Willingness to Eat Specific Insect Powders in Five Food Types.

Suyeon Park, Edgar Chambers, Jeehyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suyeon ParkDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-6769-1238
Edgar ChambersCenter for Sensory Analysis and Consumer Behavior, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-0200
Jeehyun LeeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-7531

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch 1016242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 2050, the world's population will rise to 9 billion, which implies that it is necessary to double protein production. We should consider more sustainable, alternative forms of protein. A solution to this is the use of insects, which offer high levels of protein and require less water than poultry, pork, and beef production. The objective of this study was to evaluate 13 countries' consumer perceptions regarding the willingness to eat specific types of insects as powdered ingredients in five food types. An online survey was conducted using Check All That Apply (CATA) to assess consumer perceptions across 13 countries. Approximately 630 consumers in each country were surveyed (total n > 8100). The CATA data were analyzed using Cochran's Q test, which showed highly significant differences among countries. The willingness to eat insects varied by country, food type, and insect species. The results of this study can be used to understand consumers' perceptions of insects and offer an indicator that can be used when developing insect-containing foods in the future.

Indexed as

consumercross-cultureedible insectperceptionpowder form

Identifiers

PMID40077544
PMCPMC11898450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.