Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077379›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Impact of Chip Breaker Geometry on the Performance of Actively Rotary Monolithic Turning Tools.

Richard Joch, Miroslav Cedzo, Andrej Czán, Michal Šajgalík, Jozef Holubják, Mário Drbúl, Jaromír Markovič, Miroslav Matuš

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard JochDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-0057
Miroslav CedzoDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-1872-0925
Andrej CzánDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8826-1832
Michal ŠajgalíkDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-4908-1046
Jozef HolubjákDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.
Mário DrbúlDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.
Jaromír MarkovičDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.
Miroslav MatušDepartment of Machining and Production Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia.ORCID 0009-0002-9214-8696

Funding

Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Slovak Republic 09I05-03-V02Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-20-0216Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-22-0328Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-23-0366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of chip formation is a key aspect of modern turning operations, as improper chip formation can negatively affect tool life, surface quality, and overall machining efficiency. One approach to improving chip control is the integration of a chip breaker into the geometry of the cutting tool. This study examines the impact of chip-breaking geometry on the performance of monolithic rotary tools in active rotation turning. Two types of tools were compared: one without a chip breaker and another with an integrated chip breaker. The functionality of the chip breaker was experimentally validated, demonstrating its effectiveness in shaping chip segmentation under specific process parameters. Furthermore, tool wear, workpiece surface roughness, and cutting forces were evaluated. The findings indicate that the tool equipped with a chip breaker exhibits reduced wear while maintaining comparable surface quality. However, this benefit is accompanied by a slight increase in cutting forces.

Indexed as

chip formationmachiningturning tool

Identifiers

PMID40077379
PMCPMC11902139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.