ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Selected Quality Characteristics of Thin-Walled Models Manufactured Using Powder Bed Fusion Technology.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D & 4D Printing-In Engineering Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This publication presents the results of research on selected quality features of sample models made using 3D printing technology from the Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) group and a material based on aluminum powder. Two quality areas were analyzed: tensile strength and geometric surface structure. Strength tests of thin-walled models were carried out for samples with four given thicknesses of 1, 1.4, 1.8, and 2 mm and four printing directions, namely, three in the XZ plane and one in the XY plane. The measurement of the geometric structure was carried out using optical measuring devices and by taking into account the assessment of roughness and waviness parameters. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), an analysis of the fracture of samples after rupture was carried out and the surface was assessed for technological defects created in the manufacturing process. The test results showed that for thin-walled sample models, there are certain technological limitations regarding the minimum sample thickness in the manufacturing process and that the strength of thin-walled models in relation to "solid" samples depends on both the sample thickness and the printing direction. Roughness parameters that determine functional quality characteristics such as friction and wear were determined and also showed a dependence on the printing direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.