ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Microstructure Evolution, Tensile/Nanoindentation Response, and Work-Hardening Behaviour of Prestrained and Subsequently Annealed LPBF 316L Stainless Steel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Compressive Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing: Experimental Characterization and Numerical Modeling.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing is increasingly used to produce metallic biomaterials, and post-processing is gaining increasing attention for improving the properties of as-built components. This study investigates the effect of work hardening followed by recrystallisation annealing on the tensile and nanoindentation behaviour of laser powder bed-fused (LPBF) 316L stainless steel, with the aim of optimising its mechanical properties. As-built and thermally stabilised (at 900 °C) specimens were prestrained in a uniaxially tensile manner at room temperature (0.12 plastic strain, ~75% of maximum work hardening) and subsequently annealed (at 900 °C or 1050 °C for 1 h). The microstructure and mechanical properties were then characterised by optical microscopy, SEM, EBSD, XRD, nanoindentation, and tensile testing. It was found that prestraining increased yield tensile strength (YTS) 1.2-1.7 times (to 690-699 MPa) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) ~1.2 times (to 762-770 MPa), but decreased ductility 1.5 times. Annealing led to recovery and partial static recrystallisation, decreasing YTS (to 403-427 MPa), restoring ductility, and increasing the strain hardening rate; UTS and indentation hardness were less affected. Notably, the post-LPBF thermal stabilisation hindered recrystallisation and increased its onset temperature. Mechanical property changes under prestraining and annealing are discussed with respect to microstructure and crystalline features (microstrain, crystal size, dislocation density). All specimens exhibited ductile fractures with fine/ultra-fine dimples consistent with the as-built cellular structure. The combined treatment enhanced tensile strength whilst preserving sufficient ductility, achieving a strength-ductility product of 40.3 GPa·%. This offers a promising approach for tailoring LPBF 316L for engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.