ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Mechanical Characterization of FDM 3D-Printed Components Using Advanced Measurement and Modeling Techniques.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Printing Parameters and Nozzle Diameter on the Effective Microarchitecture and Compressive Modulus of Gyroid PCL Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- The Influence of Certain Operating Conditions of the FDM Process on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials-A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- The Role of Infill Density in Impact Localization for Additively Manufactured Structures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of an efficient approach to boost fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing of felodipine-HPMC tablets for enhanced physical stability.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhancing the Performance of FFF-Printed Parts: A Review of Reinforcement and Modification Strategies for Thermoplastic Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigates the mechanical characterization of PET-G components fabricated via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), integrating experimental testing with advanced numerical modeling. Initially, an extensive parametric analysis was conducted to determine the optimal printing conditions, focusing on temperature, speed, and infill density to ensure reliable and repeatable sample fabrication. Subsequently, the study employs an inverse problem-solving approach that combines Digital Image Correlation (DIC) with Finite Element Method Updating (FEMU) to identify the material parameters, specifically Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio. The methodology allows for a precise evaluation of mechanical properties by iteratively minimizing discrepancies between experimental strain fields and FEM simulations. The results reveal significant dependencies of material stiffness on infill pattern and density, with Young's modulus varying up to 20% between different configurations. Additionally, the study highlights the limitations of conventional tensile testing for FDM materials, emphasizing the necessity for advanced full-field measurement techniques to account for anisotropy and microstructural heterogeneity. The proposed methodology enhances the accuracy of material characterization, contributing to the development of more reliable predictive models for 3D-printed components. The research provides valuable insights for optimizing FDM process parameters and establishing standardized testing protocols for additively manufactured materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.