Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077299›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Methods and Technologies for Storage Tank Condition Assessment: A Comprehensive Review.

Alexandru-Adrian Stoicescu, Razvan George Ripeanu, Maria Tănase, Liviu Toader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandru-Adrian StoicescuMechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.
Razvan George RipeanuMechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8255-8144
Maria TănaseMechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-6554
Liviu ToaderTechnical Lead & Development Srl, 107063 Corlatesti, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the current industry practices for storage tank assessment and the possibilities for improving inspection methods using the latest technologies on the market. This article presents the main methods and technologies for non-destructive testing (NDT), along with new methods that make them more efficient and economical. To further analyze the state of a tank and determine its lifetime expectancy, analysis methods are presented based on NDT results. The key aspects that can be improved and made more efficient are NDT procedures using robots/drones and autonomous devices; automated inspection procedures, like remote video inspection combined with local thickness measurement or 3D scanning of the tank elements for deformations; advanced analysis methods using the input from the NDT and inspection data collected using analytical calculations according to applicable standards; Finite Element Analysis (FEA); and digitalized models of equipment (Digital Twin) accompanied by artificial intelligence for data processing. The best way to make the process more efficient is to develop and use dedicated standardized software for tank condition assessment.

Indexed as

condition assessmentequipment lifetimelifetime extensionnon-destructive testingoil storagestorage tank

Identifiers

PMID40077299
PMCPMC11901327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.