Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077118›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Integrating AI and Assistive Technologies in Healthcare: Insights from a Narrative Review of Reviews.

Daniele Giansanti, Antonia Pirrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniele GiansantiCentro TISP, ISS, Via Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Antonia PirreraCentro TISP, ISS, Via Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0215-4842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into assistive technologies is an emerging field with transformative potential, aimed at enhancing autonomy and quality of life for individuals with disabilities and aging populations. This overview of reviews, utilizing a standardized checklist and quality control procedures, examines recent advancements and future implications in this domain. The search for articles for the review was finalized by 15 December 2024. Nineteen review studies were selected through a systematic process identifying prevailing themes, opportunities, challenges, and recommendations regarding the integration of AI in assistive technologies. First, AI is increasingly central to improving mobility, healthcare diagnostics, and cognitive support, enabling personalized and adaptive solutions for users. The integration of AI into traditional assistive technologies, such as smart wheelchairs and exoskeletons, enhances their performance, creating more intuitive and responsive devices. Additionally, AI is improving the inclusion of children with autism spectrum disorders, promoting social interaction and cognitive development through innovative devices. The review also identifies significant opportunities and challenges. AI-powered assistive technologies offer enormous potential to increase independence, reduce reliance on external support, and improve communication for individuals with cognitive disorders. However, challenges such as personalization, digital literacy among the elderly, and privacy concerns in healthcare contexts need to be addressed. Notably, AI itself is expanding the concept of assistive technology, shifting from traditional tools to intelligent systems capable of learning and adapting to individual needs. This evolution represents a fundamental change in assistive technology, emphasizing dynamic, adaptive systems over static solutions. Finally, the study emphasizes the growing economic investment in this sector, forecasting significant market growth, with AI-driven assistive devices poised to transform the landscape. Despite challenges such as high development costs and regulatory hurdles, opportunities for innovation and affordability remain. This review underscores the importance of addressing challenges related to standardization, accessibility, and ethical considerations to ensure the successful integration of AI into assistive technologies, fostering greater inclusivity and improved quality of life for users globally.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligenceassistive technologydeep learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40077118
PMCPMC11898476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.