ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Do Audible Sounds During a Metacarpophalangeal and Metatarsophalangeal Thrust Manipulation Have an Impact on Intra-Articular Joint Space and Brainwave Activity?
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoint manipulation is commonly used to manage musculoskeletal dysfunctions. Joint manipulation can result in audible sounds. The clinical significance and cause of manipulation sound remain unclear. This study aimed to identify intra-articular distance following a metacarpophalangeal (MCP) II and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) II joint manipulation in healthy subjects. Additionally, the cortical response pattern was measured.
methodsTwenty-five subjects completed this quasi-experimental repeated-measures study protocol. Musculoskeletal ultrasound was used to measure intra-articular joint distance, and a portable EEG device captured brainwave activity. The environment was controlled during testing. Initially, the joint distance of the MCP II and MTP II was measured followed by the recording of initial brainwaves. Following a pre-manipulation hold, a second brainwave measure was taken. After this, each subject underwent a thrust manipulation of either MCP II or MTP II, immediately followed by the next brainwave measurement. One minute later, the final and fourth measurement took place.
resultsAll subjects regardless of audible sound increased in joint space following both the MCP and MTP joint manipulation. The audible group had more significant EEG changes (
conclusionsThis study supports the tribonucleation theory explaining audible joint manipulation sounds. The manipulation of the MCP II joint resulted in increased Theta wave activity, indicating a state of relaxation, which was larger in the audible group. The MTP II manipulation had decreased cortical effects regardless of the presence of a sound. Despite these findings, the clinical usefulness of audible sounds remains questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.