Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40076976›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Efforts to Downsize Base Editors for Clinical Applications.

Beomjong Song

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Beomjong SongDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1I1A1A01056885Soonchunhyang University 20231291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the advent of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system in the gene editing field, diverse CRISPR-based gene editing tools have been developed for treating genetic diseases. Of these, base editors (BEs) are promising because they can carry out precise gene editing at single-nucleotide resolution without inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which pose significant risks of genomic instability. Despite their outstanding advantages, the clinical application of BEs remains challenging due to their large size, which limits their efficient delivery, particularly in adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based systems. To address this issue, various strategies have been explored to reduce the size of BEs. These approaches include truncating the nonessential domains and replacing the bulky components with smaller substitutes without compromising the editing efficiency. In this review, we highlight the importance of downsizing BEs for therapeutic applications and introduce recent advances in size-reduction strategies. Additionally, we introduce the ongoing efforts to overcome other limitations of BEs, providing insights into their potential for improving in vivo gene editing.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsDependovirusDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenetic TherapyHumansAAVbase editorCRISPRgene editing

Identifiers

PMID40076976
PMCPMC11900391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.