ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
miRNA-Based Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Using Machine Learning.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An interpretable XAI deep EEG model for schizophrenia diagnosis using feature selection and attention mechanisms.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic practices for schizophrenia are unreliable due to the lack of a stable biomarker. However, machine learning holds promise in aiding in the diagnosis of schizophrenia and other neurological disorders. Dysregulated miRNAs were extracted from public sources. Datasets of miRNAs selected from the literature and random miRNAs with designated gene targets along with related pathways were assigned as descriptors of machine-learning models. These data were preprocessed and classified using WEKA and TensorFlow, and several classifiers were tested to train the model. The Sequential neural network developed by authors performed the best of the classifiers tested, achieving an accuracy of 94.32%. Naïve Bayes was the next best model, with an accuracy of 72.23%. MLP achieved an accuracy of 65.91%, followed by Hoeffding tree with an accuracy of 64.77%, Random tree with an accuracy of 63.64%, Random forest, which achieved an accuracy of 61.36%, and lastly ADABoostM1, which achieved an accuracy of 53.41%. The Sequential neural network and Naïve Bayes classifier were tested to validate the model as they achieved the highest accuracy. Naïve Bayes achieved a validation accuracy of 72.22%, whereas the sequential neural network achieved an accuracy of 88.88%. Our results demonstrate the practicality of machine learning in psychiatric diagnosis. Dysregulated miRNA combined with machine learning can serve as a diagnostic aid to physicians for schizophrenia and potentially other neurological disorders as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.