ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Micronutrient Biofortification in Wheat: QTLs, Candidate Genes and Molecular Mechanism.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wheat Biofortification for Enhancing Iron, Zinc, and Protein: The Role of Mutation Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- PGPR-induced regulation of Zn and Fe transporters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) uncovered through integrated genome-wide analysis and functional validation.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Reframing sorghum biofortification: multi-trait nutritional dissection of Sudanese wild germplasm reveals extractability-driven breeding targets.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micronutrient deficiency (hidden hunger) is one of the serious health problems globally, often due to diets dominated by staple foods. Genetic biofortification of a staple like wheat has surfaced as a promising, cost-efficient, and sustainable strategy. Significant genetic diversity exists in wheat and its wild relatives, but the nutritional profile in commercial wheat varieties has inadvertently declined over time, striving for better yield and disease resistance. Substantial efforts have been made to biofortify wheat using conventional and molecular breeding. QTL and genome-wide association studies were conducted, and some of the identified QTLs/marker-trait association (MTAs) for grain micronutrients like Fe have been exploited by MAS. The genetic mechanisms of micronutrient uptake, transport, and storage have also been investigated. Although wheat biofortified varieties are now commercially cultivated in selected regions worldwide, further improvements are needed. This review provides an overview of wheat biofortification, covering breeding efforts, nutritional evaluation methods, nutrient assimilation and bioavailability, and microbial involvement in wheat grain enrichment. Emerging technologies such as non-destructive hyperspectral imaging (HSI)/red, green, and blue (RGB) phenotyping; multi-omics integration; CRISPR-Cas9 alongside genomic selection; and microbial genetics hold promise for advancing biofortification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.