ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Phylogeny and Functional Differentiation of the Terpene Synthase Gene Family in Angiosperms with Emphasis on
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Terpenes are pivotal for plant growth, development, and adaptation to environmental stresses. With the advent of extensive genomic data and sophisticated bioinformatics tools, new insights into the evolutionary dynamics and functional diversification of terpene synthases (TPSs) have emerged. Despite genome-wide identifications of the TPS family in certain species, comprehensive cross-species analyses remain scarce. In this study, we conducted a genome-wide identification and subgroup classification of TPS families across 115 angiosperms with available genomic sequences. Our phylogenomic synteny network analysis elucidated the complex evolutionary history of TPS genes, revealing notable expansions and contractions among subgroups. Specifically, TPS-a showed significant expansion, while TPS-b was variably lost in some Poaceae, indicating adaptive responses. TPS-c maintained considerable conservation across species, whereas TPS-e/f diverged into distinct evolutionary trajectories despite functional overlap, with TPS-e further splitting into two angiosperm-specific clades. The TPS-g subgroup displayed lineage-restricted distribution, primarily in super-rosids and monocots. Notably, TPS-d and TPS-h subgroups were absent in angiosperms. Employing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.